Most helpful client reviews
64 of 74 persons found the following review helpful.
A Powerful, Impactful Story
By thornhillatthemovies.com
“127 Hours”, conductor Danny Boyle’s (“Trainspotting”, “28 Days Later”) follow-up to “Slumdog Millionaire” is a near outstanding film. I candidly can’t tell you the last time I was so moved by a piece of celluloid. “127″ has devised both pleasant and nightmarish memories, memories that will stay with me for many, a great deal of years to come.
Aron Ralston (James Franco) speedily grabs a lot of furnishes and heads out to his bestloved spot, the canyons near Moab, Utah. As soon as the sun rises, he jumps on a mountain bike and heads out to explore and take pleasure in the outstanding outdoors, heading to a spot a great deal of twenty miles away. He crosses paths with two young women, Kristi (Kate Mara) and Megan (Amber Tamblyn) and agrees to show them the way to their destination. Once there, they swim and dive and have fun. After a few hours, they head on to finish their person journeys. As Aron navigates a narrow crevasse, a little boulder comes loose, causing him to fall and wedging his arm among the wall and the boulder. He can’t budge it and becomes worried at the sight of galore streaks of blood. Aron takes stock and has very fixed food, a heap of water, stretchy cord, a camera, a video camera and a dull knife. Before leaving for the trip, he wasn’t competent to find his Swiss Army knife, so he is left with a dull give-away promotional knife. He tries to chip away at the sandstone, to move the rock, but doesn’t make any progress. Over the next five days and twenty hours, Aron has to figure out how to use the fixed furnishes he has to survive until he may be rescued. Or, on the other hand, he has to figure out if and how he may get out of this circumstance on his own.
Boyle starts the film by masterfully depicting why Aron, and others like him, are so eager to escape the city, eager to mountain bike in the wilderness, eager to climb rock formations, eager to backpack. When he meets the two women, they even remark with regards to how they don’t feel like they figured into Aron’s day. Aron is the type of guy who actively looks for adventure and makes conclusions on the spur of the moment. This is why he agrees to spend time with the young women, setting his schedule back half a day.
As soon as Aron gets trapped, Boyle has to do something to give us more details into the adventurer’s history. He has to make us care regarding this man and he can’t in truth do that by keeping us only with Aron for the rest of the film. As Ralston tries to evaluate his situation, a memory surfaces and this gives Boyle the prospect to show us a brief portion of his past. The technique Boyle uses seems more suitable for films made in the late ’60s. And normally, this would drive me crazy. But in this situation, these moments work, principally because they are beauteous brief. They likewise move back and forth amidst more real and more imagined settings. For instance, Aron remembers a moment he and his dad shared for the duration of his childhood. They sit on an old couch in the family home, talking. Then his dad is gone and young Aron is still sitting on the couch, but the couch now sits in the crevasse Aron is trapped in, the sand and rock walls surrounding the furniture, visible to the side.
Boyle introduces us to Aron’s father (Treat Williams) and mother (Kate Burton) and the love of his life, Rana (Clemence Poesy). These moments, though brief, helps to give us clear or deep perception into Aron’s reputation and life. Because they are so brief, it is surprising that we feel we recognise Aron and his family so well. We actually get a sentiment for him and come to care for him.
A lot of the credit for the success of this film lies with Franco. For much of the comparatively short running time, Franco is the only person on screen and this would only serve to amplify any poorly acted moment, any untrue characterization, any thing that doesn’t ring true. From the basi moment he is on screen, we commence to comprehend him. He is most happy when he is explaining what numerous stretch of wilderness is, the history of a cavern, earning a good deal of bit of solitude to pay for any minute of time he is forced to spend cooped up in the city. In this element, he finds peace and revels in each moment.
When he meets Kristi and Megan, Franco’s smile helps us recognize he plainly wants to have a good time. Sex isn’t a portion of the equation, he wants to portion galore moments with like personalities. Later, when he is trapped and has a lot of time to think, he remembers back to a good deal of moments in his life. When we return to him, Franco’s demeanor and facial expressions seem to be an honorable portrayal of how the young man would react. And make us feel he is genuinely remembering these moments.
When Aron at last realizes what he has to do, Franco shows us the horror of this realization and the pain of this decision.
THE moment is both necessary and exceedingly difficult to watch. It is necessary because it is a share of the story. But so a good deal of other filmmakers would timid away from a frank depiction of this moment. Boyle doesn’t. Without it, the story would be nowhere near as impactful. Because of it, you might have nightmares. It would be gruesome enough, hard sufficient to watch if he had found his Swiss Army knife. But without it… I just shudder thinking in regards to it again.
The film ends with a coda giving us an update on Aron Ralston’s life. During the moments before this, I started to tear up because he was going to be okay, because he was going to make it, something I already knew given he wrote the book this film is based on, but I was still exceedingly moved. And the last few moments give us a glimpse of the real Ralston and all of the persons affected by this incident. Because of everything Boyle and Franco are competent to accomplish allround the film, I was exceedingly moved by these brief images.
Best of all, Boyle ends the film, presents this coda, in a way stylistically in tune with the rest of the journeying and all of those memory flashbacks/
“127 Hours” is a great piece of filmmaking. You need to see it. You may always close your eyes if that scene becomes too much for you.
22 of 26 humans found the following review helpful.
Resourcefulness And Perseverance–A Harrowing, Yet Life Affirming, Struggle For Survival
By K. Harris
From the macabre paranoia of “Shallow Grave” to the comedic debauchery of “Trainspotting” to the disturbing creepiness of “28 Days Later” to the fanciful romanticism of “Slumdog Millionaire,” conductor Danny Boyle has made kinetic films that actually connect to the viewer at a visceral level. Very much a visual stylist, Boyle uses each tool at his disposal–quick cut editing, frantic camera movement, fantasy sequences, jarring music–to genuinely delve into the aroused core of whatsoever story he is telling. At introductory glance, “127 Hours” would seem an odd follow-up to the Oscar winning “Slumdog.” Stripped down to the most primal level, “127 Hours” is one of the simplest, most straightforward messages that tells the particulars of an act or occurrence or course of events you’re likely to encounter. And yet, through the technical bells and whistles and an earnest James Franco performance, you are immersed in a world of madness, desperation, perseverance, hope, struggle and in the long run survival. And there is no denying that this very matter-of-fact tale packs a punch!
Franco plays real-life adventurer Aron Ralston. In 2003, the reckless Ralston set off to explore Utah’s Canyonlands National Park. No one knew where he is going and safety was secondary to fun in Ralston’s blissed-out commune with nature. While negotiating a crevice, a boulder dislodged and trapped Ralston’s arm stranding him in isolation within the earth. The film then documents Ralston’s dilemma for the next 127 hours. With fixed furnishes and no mobility, Boyle makes the most of his claustrophobic surroundings by inviting us into Ralston’s mind. And the essential success of “127 Hours” is that it genuinely traps us within this confined space as well. We’re there to the bitter end where survival and sacrifice meet at a crossroads.
In some ways, I wish people cold go into “127 Hours” with no expected values and forewarning of what is going to happen. I know that’s naive. Ralston’s tale is surely public domain–reported on TV, the subject of books and news features. In fact, the entire film is marketed around the gruesome turning point in Ralston’s struggle. This decisive act that spared Ralston’s life is so harrowing and Boyle does not timid away from it is unpleasantness. But the promise of this scene lingers over all that proceeds it. We are biding time for this extreme act. We know what’s going to occur and we recognise it’s going to be graphic–everyone has told us so well in advance. But that sequence is so strong, it has come to define the entire movie. “127 Hours” has in a literal sense come to be described as “the movie where he…….” (I, for my part, have resisted divulging this point–although you may read it everyplace else, including the product description and other reviews).
Franco does a great occupation making us root for Ralston. Impetuous and more or less irresponsible, this sudden intense feeling seeker didn’t take the necessary precautions advisable. He thought he was immune to the dangers inherent in the mountain. But Franco makes him such a life force, you want him to be the victor over his poor decisions. His whip smart survival intuition keeps him alive and he never gives up. But as he faces mortality, he comes to perceive his shortcomings and even faces visions of the future. His videotaped proclamations to his family are the aroused highpoint of “127 Hours.” Franco is a physical actor and acquits himself well in the adventure scenes–but it is the immobile moments that showcase an interior to Franco that hasn’t always been on full display in other films. Boyle takes full vantage of Franco and delivers one of the year’s most effective humane dramas. Stunning in it is simplicity, “127 Hours” has an energy and vitality that make it stand out from the pack. KGHarris, 11/10.
16 of 20 people found the following review helpful.
Resourcefulness And Perseverance–A Harrowing, Yet Life Affirming, Struggle For Survival
By K. Harris
From the macabre paranoia of “Shallow Grave” to the comedic debauchery of “Trainspotting” to the disturbing creepiness of “28 Days Later” to the fanciful romanticism of “Slumdog Millionaire,” conductor Danny Boyle has made kinetic films that actually connect to the viewer at a visceral level. Very much a visual stylist, Boyle uses each tool at his disposal–quick cut editing, frantic camera movement, fantasy sequences, jarring music–to in truth delve into the aroused core of whatsoever story he is telling. At introductory glance, “127 Hours” would seem an odd follow-up to the Oscar winning “Slumdog.” Stripped down to the most primal level, “127 Hours” is one of the simplest, most straightforward narrations you’re likely to encounter. And yet, through the technical bells and whistles and an earnest James Franco performance, you are immersed in a world of madness, desperation, perseverance, hope, struggle and at last survival. And there is no denying that this very matter-of-fact tale packs a punch!
Franco plays real-life adventurer Aron Ralston. In 2003, the reckless Ralston set off to explore Utah’s Canyonlands National Park. No one knew where he is going and safety was secondary to fun in Ralston’s blissed-out commune with nature. While negotiating a crevice, a boulder dislodged and trapped Ralston’s arm stranding him in isolation within the earth. The film then documents Ralston’s dilemma for the next 127 hours. With fixed furnishes and no mobility, Boyle makes the most of his claustrophobic environs by inviting us into Ralston’s mind. And the indispensable success of “127 Hours” is that it actually traps us within this confined space as well. We’re there to the bitter end where survival and sacrifice meet at a crossroads.
In a heap of ways, I wish people cold go into “127 Hours” with no expected values and forewarning of what is going to happen. I recognise that’s naive. Ralston’s tale is surely public domain–reported on TV, the subject of books and news features. In fact, the entire film is marketed around the gruesome turning point in Ralston’s struggle. This decisive act that spared Ralston’s life is so harrowing and Boyle does not timid away from it is unpleasantness. But the promise of this scene lingers over all that proceeds it. We are biding time for this uttermost act. We recognise what’s going to take place and we know it’s going to be graphic–everyone has told us so well in advance. But that sequence is so strong, it has come to define the entire movie. “127 Hours” has in a literal sense come to be described as “the movie where he…….” (I, for my part, have resisted divulging this point–although you may read it everyplace else, including the product description and other reviews).
Franco does a outstanding occupation making us root for Ralston. Impetuous and somewhat irresponsible, this sudden intense sensation seeker didn’t take the necessary precautions advisable. He thought he was immune to the dangers inherent in the mountain. But Franco makes him such a life force, you want him to be the victor over his poor decisions. His whip smart survival intuition keeps him alive and he never gives up. But as he faces mortality, he comes to understand his shortcomings and even faces visions of the future. His videotaped proclamations to his family are the aroused highpoint of “127 Hours.” Franco is a physical actor and acquits himself well in the adventure scenes–but it is the immobile moments that showcase an interior to Franco that hasn’t always been on full display in other films. Boyle takes full vantage of Franco and delivers one of the year’s most effective humane dramas. Stunning in it is simplicity, “127 Hours” has an energy and vitality that make it stand out from the pack. KGHarris, 11/10.
See all 145 client reviews…
